慶応義塾大学 法学部 傾向対策解答解説 2019

慶応義塾大学 法学部 傾向対策解答解説 2019

慶応義塾大学 法学部 傾向対策解答解説 2019

慶応義塾大学 法学部 傾向対策解答解説 2019

慶應義塾大学(慶応大学)法学部の過去問2019年の解答・解説・全訳です。受験生の入試対策のためにプロ家庭教師が出題傾向を分析実況します。

【英語の試験構成 アクセント+文法+長文1本の安定構成】
慶應義塾大学法学部の英語の試験構成は、伝統的にアクセント+文法+長文1本で安定しています。他の難関大学と異なり、アクセント問題が必ず出題されます。

【英語の出典 法学系大半+文学系少々】
慶應義塾大学法学部の英語の出典は、法学系の文章が大半で、わずかに文学系の文章が出題されます。法学系の英単語を積極的に学んでおきたいです。

【プロ家庭教師 法学部対策講座】
慶應義塾大学(慶応大学)法学部への合格対策カリキュラムをプロ家庭教師に指導依頼できます。


【大学】:慶應義塾大学(慶応大学)
【学部】:法学部
【年度】:2019年
【試験時間】:80分

【大問】:1
【形式】:適語補充+アクセント
【対策】:会話文の流れに合わせて、適切な言葉を補充します。文章全体を何度も読み直すために、速読ができるようになりたいです。合わせてアクセントの問題があり、アクセントの位置が問われています。
【目安時間】:20分/80分

【大問】:2
【形式】:適語補充
【対策】:文章に登場する法学系の英単語を、英英辞書の定義によって解答します。慶応法学部独自の出題形式です。日頃から英英辞書の定義に慣れておきたいです。
【目安時間】:10分/80分

【大問】:3
【形式】:誤文指摘
【表題】:移民は日本の繁栄の鍵 Immigrants A Key to Japan's Prosperity
【作者】:ーーー
【対策】:執筆中の文章から誤った表現を訂正する問題です。文章に正確さが求められる法学部らしい出題です。細かな文法知識を修得した後に、過去問に挑戦しましょう。文章の内容は、日本の人口減少に対して、移民政策を用いるべきという趣旨ですが、内容がわからなくとも正当はできます。
【用語】:移民 人口減少 文化摩擦
【目安時間】:20分/80分

【大問】:4
【形式】:適文補充+文章理解
【表題】:薬物との闘い The War on Drugs
【作者】:ゲルマン・ロペス German Lopez
【対策】:文章読解に特化した問題です。内容は、薬物犯罪に対して、どのように対処すべきか、複眼的な意見が述べられています。複数の主体が、それぞれどのような立場を取っているのか、批判的に読解できる訓練が求められています。設問は、パラグラフごとに内容を問う設問と、全体をまとめて内容を問う設問に分かれています。時間はあまり与えられていませんので、速読力も重視されています。
【用語】:薬物治療 マリファナ 合法化
【目安時間】:30分/80分

慶応 法学部 2019 問題1

【問題1 適語補充】
In the dialogue that follows, some words or sentences have been removed at the places marked (1)-(20). From the lists [a] and [b] below, choose the most appropriate word or sentence to fill in each of the numbered spaces and boxes. In both lists, all choices must be used; and the choices should be made to produce the most natural conversation overall.


Amy: Hey, what's new?

Carol: Not much. How about you?

Amy: (1)

Carol: You are always full of energy, aren't you? I guess you are ready for the new academic year. Which courses are you taking this semester?

Amy: (2) I'm still undecided. What about you?

Carol: (3) I'll probably take Professor Chang's course called “Introduction to Southeast Asian Studies," though.

Amy: I've heard great things about her. They say she is both brilliant and funny!

Carol: That's exactly why I'm fired (11) about taking it. A friend told me her lectures last year made the students laugh so hard that they could barely take notes! I wonder where she got her unique sense of humor.

Amy: She is a sociologist(21) (12) training, isn't she? Perhaps she could have been a successful comedian if she hadn't become an academic.

Carol: (4) Joking (13), they say she is a leading scholar in her field. She really knows her subject inside (14).

Amy: I wish there were more teachers like her.

Carol: Entertaining and insightful! (5) But, seriously, we'd better start making up our minds! There is little time before the registration period ends.

Amy: Well, there are just so many courses to choose from. I don't even know where to begin. Any other suggestions?

Carol: Well, (15) the top of my head, Professor Hayashi's “Gender in Modern Japanese Culture” sounds fascinating.

Amy: Did I tell you that I practically grew up (16) Japanese anime and manga?

Carol: (6) Your room is full of things Japanese!

Amy: I'm not going to lie. I'm still in love with Japanese pop culture (17) this day.

Carol: Is that why you've decided to study in Japan next summer?

Amy: Yes. I've studied Japanese for 7 years, and now I want to see how good I am! (18) I can't get enough of anime and manga!

Carol: You are always combining pleasure and learning! (7)

Amy: Thanks! Oh, wait, I just remembered! There is a class I really want to take.

Carol: (8)

Amy: It's called “The Deterioration(22) of Democracy in the Digital World."

Carol: (9) Who's teaching it?

Amy: Professor Johnson. He joined this university last year, and he is awesome! I ran (19) his “Social Media and the Future of Digital Democracy” last semester. (10)

Carol: Well, that's a start!

Amy: Yep. I just need to think of at least three more. In the meantime, I also have to clean up my room!

Carol: It's about time. To tell you the truth, your room is full of cute stuff, but it's magnificently(23) disorganized. Really, your untidiness is (20) belief!

Amy: If you feel that way, your help would be phenomenally(24) appreciated!




【問題1ーA 適語補充】
To fill in each of the spaces (1)-(10), choose a sentence from the list below:

0. Go on, I'm all ears.
1. I couldn't be better.
2. I wouldn't be surprised!
3. Well, I guessed as much.
4. Well, you know me.
5. It's mostly up in the air.
6. It was a total eye-opener!
7. That's a rare combination.
8. That sounds rather depressing.
9. That's what I admire about you.


[b] To fill in each of the boxes (11) — (20), choose a word from the list below, ignoring capitalization:

0. across
1. aside
2. besides
3. beyond
4. by
5. off
6. on
7. out
8. to
9. up



【問題1ーB 発音アクセント】

For each of the underlined words (21)— (24), mark the number of the syllable pronounced most strongly on your answer sheet.

(21) S01-ci2-0l3-04-gist5
(22) de1-te2-ri3-04-ra5-tion6.
(23) mag1-nif2-13-cent4-ly5
(24) phe1-nom2-e3-nal4-ly5

慶応 法学部 2019 問題1 解答

【問題1ーA 適語補充 解答】
(1) 
(2) 
(3) 
(4) 
(5) 
(6) 
(7) 
(8) 
(9) 
(10) 
(11) 
(12) 
(13) 
(14) 
(15) 
(16) 
(17) 
(18) 
(19) 
(20) 

【問題1ーB 発音アクセント 解答】
(21) 
(22) 
(23) 
(24) 

慶応 法学部 2019 問題1 解説

【問題1ーA 適語補充 解説】

Amy: Hey, what's new?

Carol: Not much. How about you?

Amy: I couldn't be better.

Carol: You are always full of energy, aren't you? I guess you are ready for the new academic year. Which courses are you taking this semester?

Amy: It's mostly up in the air. I'm still undecided. What about you?

Carol: Well, you know me. I'll probably take Professor Chang's course called “Introduction to Southeast Asian Studies," though.

Amy: I've heard great things about her. They say she is both brilliant and funny!

Carol: That's exactly why I'm fired up about taking it. A friend told me her lectures last year made the students laugh so hard that they could barely take notes! I wonder where she got her unique sense of humor.

Amy: She is a sociologist by training, isn't she? Perhaps she could have been a successful comedian if she hadn't become an academic.

Carol: I wouldn't be surprised! Joking aside, they say she is a leading scholar in her field. She really knows her subject inside out.

Amy: I wish there were more teachers like her.

Carol: Entertaining and insightful! That's a rare combination. But, seriously, we'd better start making up our minds! There is little time before the registration period ends.

Amy: Well, there are just so many courses to choose from. I don't even know where to begin. Any other suggestions?

Carol: Well, off the top of my head, Professor Hayashi's “Gender in Modern Japanese Culture” sounds fascinating.

Amy: Did I tell you that I practically grew up on Japanese anime and manga?

Carol: Well, I guessed as much. Your room is full of things Japanese!

Amy: I'm not going to lie. I'm still in love with Japanese pop culture to this day.

Carol: Is that why you've decided to study in Japan next summer?

Amy: Yes. I've studied Japanese for 7 years, and now I want to see how good I am! Besides I can't get enough of anime and manga!

Carol: You are always combining pleasure and learning! That's what I admire about you.

Amy: Thanks! Oh, wait, I just remembered! There is a class I really want to take.

Carol: Go on, I'm all ears.

Amy: It's called “The Deterioration of Democracy in the Digital World."

Carol: That sounds rather depressing. Who's teaching it?

Amy: Professor Johnson. He joined this university last year, and he is awesome! I ran across his “Social Media and the Future of Digital Democracy” last semester. It was a total eye-opener!

Carol: Well, that's a start!

Amy: Yep. I just need to think of at least three more. In the meantime, I also have to clean up my room!

Carol: It's about time. To tell you the truth, your room is full of cute stuff, but it's magnificently disorganized. Really, your untidiness is beyond belief!

Amy: If you feel that way, your help would be phenomenally appreciated!




【問題1ーB 発音アクセント 解説】

(21)

品詞名詞
単語sociologist
発音ˌsəʊsɪˈɒləʤɪst
カナソーシオロジー
意味社会学者


(22)
品詞名詞
単語deterioration
発音dɪˌtɪərɪəˈreɪʃən
カナデトリオレイション
意味悪化


(23)
品詞副詞
単語magnificently
発音mægˈnɪfɪsntli
カナマグニフィセントリイ
意味素晴らしく


(24)
品詞副詞
単語phenomenally
発音fɪˈnɒmɪnli
カナフェノメナリイ
意味現象的に

慶応 法学部 2019 問題1 全訳

【問題1ーA 適語補充 全訳】

エイミー:ねえ、その後どう?
キャロル:大したことないよ。あなたはどう?
エイミー:対して変わらないわ。
キャロル:あなたはいつも元気だよね?新しい学年に向けて準備ができていると思う。今学期はどのコースを受講しているの?
エイミー:ほとんど上の空だ。私はまだ未定だ。あなたはどう?
キャロル:さて、ご存知でしょう。おそらく、チャン教授「東南アジア研究入門」と呼ばれるコースを受講するつもりだ。
エイミー:彼女について素晴らしいことを聞いたことがある。彼らは、彼女が素晴らしいと面白いの両方だと言う!
キャロル:だからこそ、私はそれを言いたくて仕方がない。昨年、友人が私に教えてくれたのは、昨年の彼女の講義があまりにも面白いので、生徒たちはほとんどノートを取ることができなかったちはとても笑いました!彼女はユニークなユーモアのセンスをどこで身に付けたのだろう。
エイミー:彼女は努力によって社会学者になったのよね。もし彼女が学者にならなければ、おそらく彼女は成功したコメディアンであったかもしれない。
キャロル:驚きはないね!冗談はさておき、彼女が彼女の分野の主要な学者だと、彼らは言う。彼女は自分の科目を完全に知っている。
エイミー:彼女のような先生がもっといたらいいのに。
キャロル:おもしろくて洞察力がある!それはまれな組み合わせだ。しかし、真剣に、私たちは物事を決め始めた方がいいでしょう!登録期間が終了するまで、時間はほとんどない。
エイミー:まあ、選択できるコースはたくさんある。どこから始めていいかもわからない。他の提案はある?
キャロル:まあ、すぐに思いつくのは、林教授の「現代日本文化におけるジェンダー」は魅力的に聞こえる。
エイミー:私が日本のアニメや漫画で、実は育ったと言ったっけか?
キャロル:まあ、私もそう思った。あなたの部屋は日本のものでいっぱいだ!
エイミー:嘘をつくつもりはない。私は今でも日本のポップカルチャーが大好きです。
キャロル:だから、来年の夏に日本で勉強することにしたの?
エイミー:はい。私は7年間日本語を勉強してきたが、今は自分がどれだけうまいか見てみたい!それに、アニメやマンガは飽きていない!
キャロル:あなたはいつも楽しさと学習を組み合わせている!それは私があなたについて賞賛することだ。
エイミー:ありがとう!ああ、待って、私はちょうど思い出した!本当に受けたいクラスがある。
キャロル:続けて、よく聞いてるから。
エイミー:それは「デジタル世界の民主主義の悪化」と呼ばれている。
キャロル:それはむしろ憂鬱に聞こえる。誰が教えているの?
エイミー:ジョンソン教授よ。彼は昨年この大学に来たが、彼は素晴らしい!私は彼の前学期の「ソーシャルメディアとデジタル民主主義の未来」に出くわした。それは目を見張るものだった!
キャロル:さて、それはよいきっかけだね!
エイミー:はい。少なくともあと3つは考える必要がある。さらに部屋を掃除する必要もある!
キャロル:時間だね。実を言うと、部屋はかわいいものでいっぱいだけど、それは見事に散らかっている。本当に、あなたの無頓着さは信じられないほどだ!
エイミー:もしそう感じるなら、あなたの助けは現象として高く評価されるわ!

慶応 法学部 2019 問題2

【問題2 適語補充】

Read the passage below and answer the questions that follow.

The introduction of the right to plea bargain marks a major development in Japan's criminal justice system. The system enables prosecutors to drop charges or file less serious ones against suspects or defendants who cooperate by offering testimony or evidence against their accomplices(25). There are expectations that the system will be efficacious(26) in combatting organized crime. However, there are also concerns that it could tempt suspects or defendants to concoct(27) statements against others in seeking lesser penalties for themselves.

In the United States, about 90 percent of criminal cases are settled through plea bargaining, thus obviating(28) 99, a lengthy trial process and helping to reduce the huge backlog of criminal cases. Most of the plea bargaining taking place in the U.S. involves defendants pleading guilty to their own crimes in return for leniency(29) from prosecutors, such as indictment(30) on lesser charges.

In Japan, the system has been introduced as part of broader criminal justice reforms. What triggered the reforms was a series of cases involving bogus(31) charges brought against innocent people. The police and prosecutors came under swingeing(32) criticism for investigations that relied heavily on the confessions of suspects—who were occasionally coerced(33) on, by interrogators into making fabricated statements that supported the investigators' cases.

To increase transparency in the interrogation process, the revised law on criminal proceedings in 2016 made it mandatory for the police and prosecutors to make audiovisual recordings of the interrogation of suspects in certain serious crimes that are subject to lay(34) judge trials.




If you looked up the basic forms of the underlined words (25) — (34) in the above passage in a dictionary, you would find the following definitions (0-9). For each underlined word, decide which definition matches it and mark the number of that definition on your answer sheet.



0. to make up or invent something

1. to remove a problem or the need for something

2. to force someone to do something by using threats

3. not true, real, or genuine

4. very large, high, or severe

5. producing the result that is wanted or intended

6. not having expert knowledge or professional qualifications in a particular subject

7. an official accusation of a crime

8. a person who helps another to commit a crime or to do something wrong

9. the fact or quality of being less strict than expected when punishing someone or when making sure that rules are obeyed




慶応 法学部 2019 問題2 解答

【問題2 適語補充 解答】

(25) 
(26) 
(27) 
(28) 
(29) 
(30) 
(31) 
(32) 
(33) 
(34) 

慶応 法学部 2019 問題2 解説

【問題2 適語補充 解説】

言語の意味を、英英辞典の形式によって答える設問です。慶応大学法学では伝統的に出題されている形式で、今後も出題されるでしょう。英和辞書に慣れてきて、英単語の細かな用法を知りたくなってきた場合には、英英辞典を用いる習慣をつけておくとよいでしょう。

問われている英単語は法学系の専門用語が多くなっているのも特徴です。accomplices(共犯者)やindictment(起訴)やlay judge(裁判員)は、通常の英単語帳には掲載されていませんが、法学系の志望者ならば、必須表現でしょう。



【重要表現】
plea bargain 司法取引
criminal justice system 刑事司法制度
suspect サスペクト 容疑者(被疑者)
defendant ディフェンダント 被告人
testimony テスティモニー 証言
evidence エビデンス 証拠
accomplices アコンプリス 共犯者
efficacious エフィカシャス 有効な
organized crime 暴力団
concoct コンコクト 混ぜ合わせる
obviatie オビエイト 除去する
backlog バックログ 未処理案件
criminal case 刑事事件
leniency レニエンシー 減免
indictment インディクトメント 起訴
bogus ボグス 捏造の
innocent people 無実の人々
swinge スウィンジ 殴る
interrogation インターロゲーション 尋問
make A mandatory Aを義務付ける
lay judge 裁判員



【参考文献】
英語表現 法学部法律学部

慶応 法学部 2019 問題2 全訳

【問題2 適語補充 全訳】

以下の文章を読んで、続く質問に答えてください。

司法取引の権利の導入は、日本の刑事司法制度の大きな発展を示している。この制度により、容疑者や被告人で、共犯者に対する証言または証拠の提供を通じて協力するものへ、検察官は告発を取り下げたり、それほど深刻ではない事件記録を提出することができる。組織犯罪との闘いにおいて、制度は有効になると期待されている。ただし、容疑者や被告人を、自分自身に対してより少ない罰則を求めようとして、他人に対して捏造して証言するように、誘惑するのではないかとの懸念もある。

米国では、刑事事件の約90%が司法取引によって解決されていて、それにより長い公判手続きを省け、刑事事件の膨大な未処理案件を減らすことができる。米国で行われている司法取引の大部分は、より軽い起訴などの検察官からの恩赦を見返りとして、自分の犯罪に対して有罪を認定する被告人が関与している。

日本では、この制度はより広範な刑事司法制度改革の一環として導入された。改革のきっかけとなったのは、罪のない人々に対する捏造された告発を伴う一連の事件だった。警察と検察官は、被疑者の自白に大きく依存した調査に対する痛烈な批判を受けた---被疑者は時に強要され、取調担当により、事件調査を支持する供述を作らされた。
取調過程の透明性を高めるため、2016年の刑事訴訟法の改正により、警察と検察官は、裁判員の対象となる特定の重大犯罪の容疑者の取調べには、視聴覚記録を作成することが義務付けられた。

慶応 法学部 2019 問題3

【問題3 誤文訂正】
Read the draft essay below that a student is trying to improve for an English writing class and answer the questions that follow.



Immigrants: A Key to Japan's Prosperity

According to a projection by the government, Japan will have lost as much as 40% of its workers by 2065, at the current birth rate. In contrast, the world population will have grown by about the same percentage by then. What does an answer for this difficult problem exists(35)? You can import from abroad what you don't have at home. In my opinion, Japan should accept far more immigrant workers, and I am going to describe about three viewpoints, the nation's economy and contribution to the world.(36)

First, we need to solve the problem of the aged society.(37) Work insufficiency is already occurring at many shops(38), for example, some family restaurants are not open for 24 hours any longer. We must accept as many young immigrants as possible and as quickly as possible, because they would live in this country for a long time, pay taxes, and raise children. Without them, we will soon become impossible to support for the aging population(39) that has been increasing rapidly.

Next, if we accepted more immigrants, we can give a lot of contribution to the world(40) ( A )In 2017, more than 2 million refugees left home for fear of war or prosecution. ( B )Yet, Japan accepted only 20 of them, while Australia agreed to accept as many as 12,000. ( C )The human-rights activist mentions that(41) “While Japan is a strong Asian democracy, it is not showing global ethical leadership on human rights." ( D ) Furthermore, refugees are hard workers despite all the difficulty they face, since they have no home to return to.

In conclusion, we should accept more foreign immigrants for the sake of Japan, and the world too. You might say that foreigners create crimes and other problems. However, there will be a possibility that because of them, Japan becomes to destroy(42) its traditional inward thinking. For our future, we should choose various but live Japan.(43)



【問題3ーA 誤文訂正】
The questions below contain revisions that classmates suggested for the underlined parts (35) — (43) in the above essay. In each question, mark the number of the revision (1-4) on your answer sheet that would produce the most desired improvement in grammar, word choice, punctuation, and style as well as in the effectiveness of the discussion overall.


(35)
1. What does an answer exist for this difficult problem?
2. What does a solution exist to this difficult problem?
3. What remedy exists for this difficult problem?
4. What options against this difficult problem exists?


(36)
1. I will debate about two factors, the nation's economy and contribution to the world.
2. I will discuss about the following; the nation's economy and contribution to the world.
3. for two purposes; to protect the nation's economy and contribution to the world.
4. for the following reasons: to protect the nation's economy and to contribute to the world.


(37)
1. we should take urgent measures toward the aging society.
2. we should reverse the aging society by rising the birth rate.
3. more immigrants are needed in order to maintain our economy.
4. more workers are important for maintaining our economics.


(38)
1. Labor shortages have already been occurred in many restaurants,
2. Labor shortages are already seen in many different industries;
3. A worker shortage had already took place in many different work places:
4. A supply for workers have already been short in various areas


(39)
1. we would quickly become unable to support for the aging population
2. we would quickly find it impossible to support the aged population
3. we will soon be impossible to provide support for the elderly
4. it will soon become impossible to support for the aging population


(40)
1. if we accepted more immigrants, we can provide much contribution to the world.
2. if we should accept more immigrants, we will make much contribution to the world.
3. accepting more immigrants will enable Japan to increase its contribution to the world.
4. acception of more immigrants would enable our contribution to the world.


(41)
1. A human-rights activist said,
2. A human-rights activist pointed out that
3. As the human-rights activist mentions,
4. As a human-right activist say,


(42)
1. they have the potential to rid Japan of
2. it is possible for them to remove Japan from
3. there is the high likelihood that they make Japan free
4. there would be the possibility that they make Japan destroy


(43)
1. we should select the various and lively Japan.
2. we should create versatile and vigorous nation.
3. which would you prefer: safe and calm Japan, or risky and energetic Japan?
4. which would you choose, a uniform but static nation or a diverse but energetic one?



【問題3ーB 誤文訂正】
Four of the sentences in the third paragraph of the above essay are labeled at the beginning with upper-case letters of the alphabet (A) — (D). Identify one labeled sentence that is most clearly out of place and should be deleted. Then mark the number (1—4) corresponding to that sentence on your answer sheet.

(44) Delete:
1. sentence (A)
2. sentence (B)
3. sentence (C)
4. sentence (D)

慶応 法学部 2019 問題3 解答

【問題3 誤文訂正 解答】


【問題3ーA 誤文訂正 解答】
(35) 
(36) 
(37) 
(38) 
(39) 
(40) 
(41) 
(42) 
(43) 
(44) 


【問題3ーB 誤文訂正 解答】
(44) 

慶応 法学部 2019 問題3 解説


【問題3 誤文訂正 解説】

(35)

What+名詞の疑問文です。

1と2は、Whatだけで不自然なので、不適切です。

4は主語optionsが複数形であるにもかかわらず、動詞exsitが三単現活用してしまっているので、不適切です。

× 1. What does an answer exist for this difficult problem?
× 2. What does a solution exist to this difficult problem?
 3. What remedy exists for this difficult problem?
× 4. What options against this difficult problem exists?


(36)

論点の数をまとめている文章です。

1は、factrosの言い換えにカンマを用いているので、不適切です。

2は、followingの言い換えにセミコロンマを用いているので、不適切です。ここはコロンを用います。

3は、purposesの言い換えにセミコロンマを用いているので、不適切です。ここはコロンを用います。

× 1. I will debate about two factors, the nation's economy and contribution to the world.
× 2. I will discuss about the following; the nation's economy and contribution to the world.
× 3. for two purposes; to protect the nation's economy and contribution to the world.
 4. for the following reasons: to protect the nation's economy and to contribute to the world.


英作文 文法 カンマ・コロン・セミコロン・ダッシュ用法

discuss 物 with 人 discuss aboutは間違い


(37)

労働力として移民が必要とされるという文章です。

1と2は、文章内容と合っていないので、不適切です。

4は、economicsが経済学という学問になってしまうので、不適切です。ここはeconomyがふさわしいです。

× 1. we should take urgent measures toward the aging society.
× 2. we should reverse the aging society by rising the birth rate.
× 3. more immigrants are needed in order to maintain our economy.
 4. more workers are important for maintaining our economics.


(38)

労働力不足という事実を指摘する文章です。

1は、occurredが受動態なので、不適切です。ここでは能動態がふさわしいです。

3は、tookが過去形なので、不適切です。ここではhadを受けてtakenと完了形にするのがふさわしいです。

4は、haveが三単現になっていないので、不適切です。ここは三単現のhasがふさわしいです。

× 1. Labor shortages have already been occurred in many restaurants,
 2. Labor shortages are already seen in many different industries;
× 3. A worker shortage had already took place in many different work places:
× 4. A supply for workers have already been short in various areas


(39)

労働力が高齢化社会を支えるという文章です。

1は、他動詞supportが前置詞forを取っているので、不適切です。ここではforは不要です。

3は、人の主語に対してpossible/impossibleは取れませんので、不適切です。ここではunableがふさわしいです。

4は、他動詞supportが前置詞forを取っているの、不適切です。ここではforは不要です。

× 1. we would quickly become unable to support for the aging population
 2. we would quickly find it impossible to support the aged population
× 3. we will soon be impossible to provide support for the elderly
× 4. it will soon become impossible to support for the aging population


support 人物 support forは間違い 解説例文

可能の表現 can・able・possible・capable 解説例文


(40)

1は、if条件節の中でacceptedと過去形が用いられているので、不適切です。ここでは現在形のacceptがふさわしいです。

2は、shouldが不要です。

4は、enableの構文が壊れています。enable+目的語+to doという形がふさわしいです。

× 1. if we accepted more immigrants, we can provide much contribution to the world.
× 2. if we should accept more immigrants, we will make much contribution to the world.
 3. accepting more immigrants will enable Japan to increase its contribution to the world.
× 4. acception of more immigrants would enable our contribution to the world.


(41)

2は、that節が、不適切です。文章の後ろには節(主語動詞の組み合わせ)はありません。

3と4は、Asを用いているので、節の数が合わないので、不適切です。

 1. A human-rights activist said,
× 2. A human-rights activist pointed out that
× 3. As the human-rights activist mentions,
× 4. As a human-right activist say,


(42)

2は、removeが文章内容に合っていません。

3は、freeが文章内容に合っていません。

4は、make Japan destroyが文章内容に合っていません。

 1. they have the potential to rid Japan of
× 2. it is possible for them to remove Japan from
× 3. there is the high likelihood that they make Japan free
× 4. there would be the possibility that they make Japan destroy


(43)

1は、the variousは「さまざまな種類の」という意味なので、不適切です。ここはdiverseがふさわしいです。

2は、versatileは「さまざまな用途がある」という意味なので、不適切です。ここはdiverseがふさわしいです。

3は、preferは前置詞toを取りますので、不適切です。make Japan destroyが文章内容に合っていません。

× 1. we should select the various and lively Japan.
× 2. we should create versatile and vigorous nation.
× 3. which would you prefer: safe and calm Japan, or risky and energetic Japan?
 4. which would you choose, a uniform but static nation or a diverse but energetic one?



【問題3ーB 誤文訂正】
Four of the sentences in the third paragraph of the above essay are labeled at the beginning with upper-case letters of the alphabet (A) — (D). Identify one labeled sentence that is most clearly out of place and should be deleted. Then mark the number (1—4) corresponding to that sentence on your answer sheet.

(44) Delete: 4. sentence (D)

前文では、日本の人道的役割を果たすべきとの主張があります。While Japan is a strong Asian democracy, it is not showing global ethical leadership on human rights.

(D)は人道的な内容ではなありませんので、ここでは消去すべきです。



慶応 法学部 2019 問題3 完成文

【問題3 誤文訂正 完成文】
Immigrants: A Key to Japan's Prosperity

According to a projection by the government, Japan will have lost as much as 40% of its workers by 2065, at the current birth rate. In contrast, the world population will have grown by about the same percentage by then. What remedy exists for this difficult problem? You can import from abroad what you don't have at home. In my opinion, Japan should accept far more immigrant workers, and for the following reasons: to protect the nation's economy and to contribute to the world.

First, more workers are important for maintaining our economics. Labor shortages are already seen in many different industries; for example, some family restaurants are not open for 24 hours any longer. We must accept as many young immigrants as possible and as quickly as possible, because they would live in this country for a long time, pay taxes, and raise children. Without them, we would quickly find it impossible to support the aged population that has been increasing rapidly.

Next, accepting more immigrants will enable Japan to increase its contribution to the world. In 2017, more than 2 million refugees left home for fear of war or prosecution. Yet, Japan accepted only 20 of them, while Australia agreed to accept as many as 12,000. A human-rights activist said “While Japan is a strong Asian democracy, it is not showing global ethical leadership on human rights."

In conclusion, we should accept more foreign immigrants for the sake of Japan, and the world too. You might say that foreigners create crimes and other problems. However, they have the potential to rid Japan of its traditional inward thinking. For our future, which would you choose, a uniform but static nation or a diverse but energetic one?

慶応 法学部 2019 問題3 全訳


【問題3 誤文訂正 全訳】

移民:日本繁栄の鍵

政府推計によると、日本は現在の出生率で、労働者の40%ほどを2065年までに失うでしょう。対照的に、世界人口はそれまでにほぼ同割合で増加するでしょう。この困難な問題にはどのような救済策がありますか?自宅にないものは、海外から輸入できます。私の意見では、日本ははるかに多くの移民労働者を受け入れるべきであり、その理由は次のとおりです。国の経済を保護し、世界に貢献するためです。

まず、私たちの経済を維持するために、より多くの労働者は重要です。労働力不足はすでに多くの異なる産業で見られています。例えば、一部のファミリーレストランはもう24時間営業をしていません。私たちは若い移民を、できるだけ多く、できるだけ早く受け入れなければなりません。なぜなら彼らはこの国に長く住み、税金を支払い、子供を育てるからです。彼らなしでは、急速に増加している高齢者人口を支援することはすぐに不可能だとわかります。

次に、より多くの移民を受け入れることで、日本は世界貢献を増すことができます。2017年には、戦争や起訴を恐れて200万人以上の難民が母国を出ました。しかし、日本はそのうち20人しか受け入れませんでしたが、オーストラリアは最大12,000人を受け入れることに同意しました。人権活動家は「日本は強力なアジアの民主主義国であるが、人権に関する世界的な倫理的指導力を示していない」と述べた。

結論として、私たちは日本のために、そして世界のために、より多くの外国人移民を受け入れるべきです。外国人は犯罪やその他の問題を引き起こすと言うかもしれません。しかし、彼らは日本から伝統的な内向思考を取り除く可能性を持っています。私たちの未来のために、あなたはどちらを選択しますか。均質で動かない国家か多様性があるが活動的な国家か。

慶応 法学部 2019 問題4

【問題4 長文読解】
Read the article below and answer the questions that follow.


[A]  Some countries have taken radical steps toward drug rehabilitation, implicitly recognizing that not all addicts can be cured of drug dependency. Several European countries prescribe and administer, with supervision, heroin to a small number of addicts who prove resistant to other treatments. These programs allow some addicts to satisfy their drug dependency without harming themselves through overuse and without resorting to other crimes, such as robbery and burglary, to obtain drugs.

[B]  Researchers credit the heroin-assisted treatment program in Switzerland, the first national scheme of its kind, with reductions in drug-related crimes and improvements in the social functioning of addicts. But some supporters of the so-called “war on drugs” argue that these programs give the false impression that drug habits can be managed safely, which could weaken the social stigma surrounding drug use and lead more people to try dangerous drugs.

[C]  Drug policy experts point out that there are several ways to legalize a drug. For example, in a January 2015 report about marijuana legalization for the Vermont legislature, some of the top drug policy experts in the US outlined several alternatives, including allowing possession and growing but not sales, allowing distribution only within small private clubs, or having the state government operate the supply chain and sell marijuana.

[D]  Many drug policy experts argue that the criminalization of drug possession is flawed and has contributed to the massive rise of prison numbers in the US. To these experts, the answer is decriminalizing all drug possession while keeping selling and supplying illegal-a scheme that would, in theory, keep nonviolent drug users out of prison but still let the police go after illegal supplies.

[E]  A 2009 report found that after Portugal decriminalized all drugs, people were more willing to seek out rehabilitation programs. Glenn Greenwald, who authored the report, wrote: “The most substantial barrier to offering treatment to the addict population was the addicts' fear of arrest. A major justification for decriminalization was that it would break down that barrier, enabling effective treatment options to be offered to addicts once they no longer feared prosecution. Moreover, decriminalization freed up resources that could be channeled into treatment and other harm-reduction programs."

[F]  Some drug policy reform advocates and experts, however, are critical of the decriminalization of drug use. Isaac Campos, a drug historian at the University of Cincinnati, has argued that the black market might even be encouraged because more people might try using drugs if they no longer feared arrest. He said, "we don't know if that's the case, but it's possible.”




(45) Which of the following statements can be made with the most certainty on the basis of paragraph [A]?

1. In some countries, it is thought that some drug addicts can never stop taking drugs.
2. In some countries, the number of heroin addicts has greatly increased.
3. Only those addicts who refuse other treatments are prescribed heroin.
4. Many of those who receive treatment for drugs go back to committing crimes.


(46) Which of the following best restates the objection made to the scheme in Switzerland, as discussed in paragraph [B]?

1. The program may reduce crime but will cause drug production to increase.
2. The results of the Swiss scheme are impressive but unreliable.
3. More people may try dangerous drugs if they think drug use is generally accepted.
4. Only safe drug habits should be permitted by society.


(47) Which of the following best represents the arguments made by supporters of drug decriminalization in paragraph [D]?

1. Decriminalization would increase the number of prisoners but better control the availability of drugs.
2. Decriminalization would reduce the number of prisoners and still control the availability of drugs.
3. Decriminalization would only apply to drug users who are not violent.
4. Decriminalization would make it easier to arrest drug users for possession.


(48) What is the main point made by the author in paragraph [E]?

1. Portuguese addicts are afraid of receiving treatment.
2. Approaches like that taken by Portugal are expensive but effective.
3. Addicts in Portugal sought help when they were no longer in danger of punishment.
4. Portugal offers a range of treatment programs to drug addicts.




[G]  Jeffrey Miron, an economist at Harvard University, supports full legalization, which would include the legalization of sales, even if it means the commercialization of drugs that are currently illegal. This, he said, is the only complete answer to eliminating the black market as a source of revenue for violent criminal groups.

[H]  However, Mark Kleiman, one of the leading drug experts in the country, said full legalization could foster and encourage more problem drug users. For-profit drug businesses, just like alcohol and tobacco companies, would prefer heavy users, because the heavy users tend to buy much more of their product. In Colorado's legal marijuana market, for example, the heaviest 30 percent of users make up nearly 90 percent of demand for marijuana. “They are an industry with a set of objectives that flatly contradicts public interest,” Kleiman said.

[I]  Miron argued that even if sales are legalized, drugs could be taxed and regulated similarly to or more harshly than tobacco and alcohol. “You could absolutely legalize drugs and have restrictions on commercialization,” Miron said. “Those should be separate questions.”

[J]  Kleiman argued that the alcohol model has clear pitfalls. Some experts consider alcohol to be one of the most dangerous drugs. It causes health problems that kill tens of thousands each year and is often linked to violent crime.

[K]  On the other hand, those who support the drug war point to evidence that it increases prices and decreases accessibility far beyond taxes and regulation could. A 2014 study by Jon Caulkins, a drug policy expert at Carnegie Mellon University, found that prohibition multiplies drug prices by as much as 10 times, so legalization—by eliminating prohibition could make drugs considerably cheaper.

[L]  Decriminalization, then, is a (  X  ). It would necessarily permit a certain amount of drug use in society. However, it would reduce the levels of imprisonment while continuing operations that seek to reduce drug sales by gangs and hopefully make a drug habit less dangerous. This is a common refrain of drug policy that is repeated again and again by experts: a perfect solution doesn't exist, so policy making should focus on picking the best of many bad options. There are problems related to freedom, pleasure, health, crime, and public safety. We can focus on one or two of those—maybe even three with different drugs. But we have to pay the piper somewhere.

(Adapted from German Lopez ed., “The war on drugs, explained,” Vox.)


(49) Taking paragraphs [G] through [J] together, which of the following best represents the point of the greatest disagreement between Jeffrey Miron and Mark Kleiman?

1. whether relying on the market is the best way to solve the drug problem
2. whether black markets can be completely replaced by legitimate industries
3. whether companies marketing newly-legalized drugs should be regulated strictly
4. whether alcohol can be considered as dangerous as currently illegal drugs



(50) — (55) On the basis of this article, which of the individuals or groups marked (1-6) in the most likely to make each of the remarks in (50) —(55)? All choices must be used.

(50) One idea is that the state itself should make drugs available.
(51) If drug addicts stop being afraid, they can be cured.
(52) If you want to stop gangs profiting from drugs, you must make them easily available.
(53) If drugs were no longer illegal, drug prices would be much lower.
(54) If using drugs were no longer illegal, more people would possibly use them.
(55) If selling drugs were no longer illegal, some people would use more of them.


1. Experts reporting to the Vermont legislature
2. Glenn Greenwald
3. Isaac Campos
4. Jeffrey Miron
5. Mark Kleiman
6. Jon Caulkins




(56) — (57) A portion of paragraph [L] marked by the bracketed space ( X ) has been removed from the text and the words that make it up are rearranged below in alphabetical order. Determine the original order and mark the numbers of the third and eighth words as the answers to questions (56) and (57), respectively, on your answer sheet.

0. war
1. the
2. reforming
3. on
4. of
5. in
6. drugs
7. compromise
8. bit
9. a


(58) Which of the following best expresses the meaning of the underlined phrase "we have to pay the piper somewhere” in paragraph [L]?

1. we must ask some people to shoulder the burden on behalf of the others
2. we cannot obtain all benefits but should enjoy those we have
3. we cannot resolve all problems and must live with some
4. we cannot resolve all problems ourselves and must seek for outside assistance


German Lopez. The War on Drugs. 2016.

慶応 法学部 2019 問題4 解答

【問題4 長文読解 解答】
(45) 
(46) 
(47) 
(48) 
(49) 
(50) 
(51) 
(52) 
(53) 
(54) 
(55) 
(56) 
(57) 
(58) 

慶応 法学部 2019 問題4 解説

【問題4 長文読解 解説】
文章読解に特化した問題です。内容は、薬物犯罪に対して、どのように対処すべきか、複眼的な意見が述べられています。複数の主体が、それぞれどのような立場を取っているのか、批判的に読解できる訓練が求められています。設問は、パラグラフごとに内容を問う設問と、全体をまとめて内容を問う設問に分かれています。時間はあまり与えられていませんので、速読力も重視されています。


(45) 

implicitly recognizing that not all addicts can be cured of drug dependencyとあるので、すべての麻薬中毒が完治できるとは思っていないと暗黙に認めていることになります。


(46) 

these programs give the false impression that drug habits can be managed safely, which could weaken the social stigma surrounding drug use and lead more people to try dangerous drugsとあるので、人々の薬物への印象が代わり、薬物摂取する人間が増えるのではないかと懸念しています。


(47) 

decriminalizing all drug possessionとあるので、すべての麻薬を合法化することには賛成しています。さらにbut still let the police go after illegal suppliesとあるので供給を管理できると主張しています。


(48) 

treatment options to be offered to addicts once they no longer feared prosecutionとあるので、罰せられなければ、麻薬中毒患者はかえって治療を受けやすうくなると主張しています。


(49) 

Jeffrey Miron, an economist at Harvard University, supports full legalizationとあるように、ジェフリー・ミロンは完全合法化して自由市場に任せるべきと主張しています。反対にMark Kleiman, one of the leading drug experts in the country, said full legalization could foster and encourage more problem drug usersとあるようにマーク・クレイマンは完全合法化には明確に反対しています。


(50) 

Vermont legislature(バーモント州議会)の報告では、the state government operate the supply chain and sell marijuanaと述べられており、州政府がマリファナを専売する計画が述べられています。


(51) 

Glenn Greenwaldはポルトガルの麻薬合法化について報告しており、Portugal decriminalized all drugs, people were more willing to seek out rehabilitation programsとあるので、麻薬合法化と更生プログラムの参加率の関係について述べています。


(52) 

Jeffrey Mironは、only complete answer to eliminating the black market as a source of revenue for violent criminal groupsとあるように、完全合法化により、闇市場を駆逐できると主張しています。


(53) 

Jon Caulkinsは、prohibition multiplies drug prices by as much as 10 times, so legalization—by eliminating prohibition could make drugs considerably cheaperとあるように、薬物合法化により薬物価格が下がると主張しています。


(54) 

Isaac Camposはblack market might even be encouraged because more people might try using drugs if they no longer feared arrestとあるように、薬物合法化は、利用者を広げると主張しています。


(55) 

Mark KleimanはFor-profit drug businesses, just like alcohol and tobacco companies, would prefer heavy usersとあるように、薬物の販売者に注目して議論しています。


(56) 
(57) 

正解文はis a bit of a compromise in reforming the war on drugsとなります。


(58) 


we cannot resolve all problems and must live with some
私たちはすべての問題を解決することはできず、いつかの問題とともに生きていかなければなりません。



【重要表現】
drug rehabilitation 薬物治療
addict 依存症患者
heroin ヘロイン
treatment 治療技術
crime 犯罪
robbery 窃盗
burglary 強盗
stigma 刻印
legalize 合法化する
marijuana マリファナ
criminalization 犯罪化
arrest 逮捕する
alcohol アルコール
tobacco タバコ
piper パイパー 喫煙者
imprisonment 懲役


英語表現 法学部法律学部

慶応 法学部 2019 問題4 完成文

【問題4 長文読解 完成文】
[A]  Some countries have taken radical steps toward drug rehabilitation, implicitly recognizing that not all addicts can be cured of drug dependency. Several European countries prescribe and administer, with supervision, heroin to a small number of addicts who prove resistant to other treatments. These programs allow some addicts to satisfy their drug dependency without harming themselves through overuse and without resorting to other crimes, such as robbery and burglary, to obtain drugs.

[B]  Researchers credit the heroin-assisted treatment program in Switzerland, the first national scheme of its kind, with reductions in drug-related crimes and improvements in the social functioning of addicts. But some supporters of the so-called “war on drugs” argue that these programs give the false impression that drug habits can be managed safely, which could weaken the social stigma surrounding drug use and lead more people to try dangerous drugs.

[C]  Drug policy experts point out that there are several ways to legalize a drug. For example, in a January 2015 report about marijuana legalization for the Vermont legislature, some of the top drug policy experts in the US outlined several alternatives, including allowing possession and growing but not sales, allowing distribution only within small private clubs, or having the state government operate the supply chain and sell marijuana.

[D]  Many drug policy experts argue that the criminalization of drug possession is flawed and has contributed to the massive rise of prison numbers in the US. To these experts, the answer is decriminalizing all drug possession while keeping selling and supplying illegal-a scheme that would, in theory, keep nonviolent drug users out of prison but still let the police go after illegal supplies.

[E]  A 2009 report found that after Portugal decriminalized all drugs, people were more willing to seek out rehabilitation programs. Glenn Greenwald, who authored the report, wrote: “The most substantial barrier to offering treatment to the addict population was the addicts' fear of arrest. A major justification for decriminalization was that it would break down that barrier, enabling effective treatment options to be offered to addicts once they no longer feared prosecution. Moreover, decriminalization freed up resources that could be channeled into treatment and other harm-reduction programs."

[F]  Some drug policy reform advocates and experts, however, are critical of the decriminalization of drug use. Isaac Campos, a drug historian at the University of Cincinnati, has argued that the black market might even be encouraged because more people might try using drugs if they no longer feared arrest. He said, "we don't know if that's the case, but it's possible.”

[G]  Jeffrey Miron, an economist at Harvard University, supports full legalization, which would include the legalization of sales, even if it means the commercialization of drugs that are currently illegal. This, he said, is the only complete answer to eliminating the black market as a source of revenue for violent criminal groups.

[H]  However, Mark Kleiman, one of the leading drug experts in the country, said full legalization could foster and encourage more problem drug users. For-profit drug businesses, just like alcohol and tobacco companies, would prefer heavy users, because the heavy users tend to buy much more of their product. In Colorado's legal marijuana market, for example, the heaviest 30 percent of users make up nearly 90 percent of demand for marijuana. “They are an industry with a set of objectives that flatly contradicts public interest,” Kleiman said.

[I]  Miron argued that even if sales are legalized, drugs could be taxed and regulated similarly to or more harshly than tobacco and alcohol. “You could absolutely legalize drugs and have restrictions on commercialization,” Miron said. “Those should be separate questions.”

[J]  Kleiman argued that the alcohol model has clear pitfalls. Some experts consider alcohol to be one of the most dangerous drugs. It causes health problems that kill tens of thousands each year and is often linked to violent crime.

[K]  On the other hand, those who support the drug war point to evidence that it increases prices and decreases accessibility far beyond taxes and regulation could. A 2014 study by Jon Caulkins, a drug policy expert at Carnegie Mellon University, found that prohibition multiplies drug prices by as much as 10 times, so legalization—by eliminating prohibition could make drugs considerably cheaper.

[L]  Decriminalization, then, is is a bit of a compromise in reforming the war on drugs. It would necessarily permit a certain amount of drug use in society. However, it would reduce the levels of imprisonment while continuing operations that seek to reduce drug sales by gangs and hopefully make a drug habit less dangerous. This is a common refrain of drug policy that is repeated again and again by experts: a perfect solution doesn't exist, so policy making should focus on picking the best of many bad options. There are problems related to freedom, pleasure, health, crime, and public safety. We can focus on one or two of those—maybe even three with different drugs. But we have to pay the piper somewhere.

慶応 法学部 2019 問題4 全訳

【問題4 長文読解 全訳】

[A] 一部の国では、薬物治療に向けて抜本的な措置を講じており、すべての常習者が薬物依存症を治癒できるわけではないことを暗黙的に認識している。いくつかのヨーロッパ諸国では、他の治療方法に耐性ありと証明されている少数の中毒者に、ヘロインを、監督下ではあるが、処方および管理している。これらの政策により、中毒者の中には、乱用に自暴自棄になることはなく、窃盗や強盗や他犯罪により薬物を入手することなく、薬物依存を解消することができる。

[B] 研究者は、スイスにおけるヘロイン補助治療政策を評価していて、これはこの手の初めての国家計画であり、麻薬関連犯罪の減少と中毒者の社会機能の改善と、評価している。しかし、いわゆる「麻薬戦争」の支持者の一部は、これらの政策は麻薬習慣を安全に管理できるという誤った印象を与え、それが麻薬使用を取り巻くケガレを弱め、より多くの人々を危険な麻薬に挑戦させる可能性があると主張している。

[C] 薬物政策の専門家は、薬物を合法化する方法がいくつかあると指摘している。例えば、バーモント州議会のマリファナ合法化に関する2015年1月の報告で、米国の一部の薬物政策の専門家はいくつかの代替案を提示し、所有許可、販売許可はしない育成、小規模なプライベートクラブ内でのみ配布許可、または州政府の販売網でのマリファナの運営販売、を含んでいる。

[D] 多くの麻薬政策の専門家は、麻薬所持の犯罪化には欠陥があり、米国の刑務所数の大幅増加の一因となっていると主張しています。これらの専門家にとっての答えは、違法薬物の販売供給を続けながら、すべての麻薬の所有を合法化することだ。計画では、理論上は、合法的に薬物利用者を監獄に入れずに、しかし一方で警察には違法供給を捜査させる。

[E] 2009年の報告では、ポルトガルがすべての薬物を合法化した後、人々は更生治療を探す傾向が強まっていることがわかった。この報告書を執筆したグレン・グリーンウォルドは次のように書いています。「中毒者に治療を提供する上で最も大きな障壁は、中毒者の逮捕に対する恐怖だった。合法化の主な理由は、その障壁を打ち破り、刑事訴追を恐れなくなった中毒者に効果的な治療の選択肢ンを提供できるようにすることだった。さらに、非犯罪化により、治療やその他の無害化政策に利用できる資源が解放された」

[F] しかし、薬物政策改革の支持者や専門家の中には、薬物使用の合法化に批判的なものもあります。シンシナティ大学の薬物歴史家であるアイザック・カンポスは、逮捕を恐れなくなったら、より多くの人々が薬物を使用してみたくなるので、闇市場も奨励される可能性があると、主張している。彼は「その通りになるかどうかはわからないが、可能性はある」と言った。

[G] ハーバード大学のエコノミストであるジェフリー・ミロンは、たとえ現在違法な薬物の商業化を意味するとしても、販売の合法化を含む完全な合法化を支持している。これは、暴力的な犯罪集団の収入源として闇市場を排除する唯一の完全な答えだと彼は言った。

[H] しかし、国内有数の麻薬専門家の1人であるマーク・クレイマンは、完全な合法化がより多くの問題のある麻薬使用者を助長し、奨励できると述べた。営利目的の麻薬販売は、アルコール会社やタバコ会社と同じように、重度中毒者を好むだろう。なぜなら、重度中毒者は商品をより多く購入する傾向があるからだ。例えば、コロラド州の合法マリファナ市場では、最も重い30%の消費者がマリファナ需要の90%近くを占めている。「彼らは、公共の利益と完全に矛盾する一連の目的を持つ産業だ」とクライマンは言った。

[I] ミロンは、たとえ販売が合法化されたとしても、タバコやアルコールと同様かまたはそれよりも厳しい薬物課税および薬物規制がなされる可能性があると主張した。「薬物を完全に合法化し、商業化を制限することができる」とミロンは言った。「それらは別々の問題であるべきだ」

[J] クレイマンは、アルコールモデルには明確な落とし穴があると主張した。一部の専門家は、アルコールが最も危険な薬物の1つであると考えている。それは毎年何万人もを殺す健康問題を引き起こし、しばしば暴力犯罪と関連がある。

[K] 一方、麻薬戦争を支持する人々は、それが価格を引き上げ、税金や規制をはるかに超えて入手可能性を低下させるという証拠を指摘している。カーネギーメロン大学の薬物政策の専門家であるジョン・カルキンによる2014年の研究では、禁止は薬物価格を10倍も増加させるため、合法化は、禁止を解除することで、薬物を大幅に安くする可能性がある。

[L] したがって、合法化は、薬物との戦争を改革する上での、少しの妥協だ。それは必然的に社会における薬物の一定量の使用を許可する。しかし、暴力団による薬物販売を減らし、できれば薬物の習慣をより危険ではないものにしようとする操作を継続しながら、投獄の水準を下げるだろう。これは、専門家によって何度も繰り返される薬物政策のありきたりな反復だ。完璧な解決策は存在しないため、政策決定は多くの悪い選択肢から最良のものを選ぶことに焦点を合わせるべきた。自由、喜び、健康、犯罪、公共の安全に関連する問題がある。そのうちの1つまたは2つに焦点を当てることができます。おそらく、薬物が異なれば3つだ。しかし、私たちはどこかで薬物利用者に我慢しなければならない。

似ている記事
スポンサーさん